The Market Online - At The Bell

Join our daily newsletter At The Bell to receive exclusive market insights

  • China has just forked out over $200 million to build a fishery complex just north of mainland Australia — in an area where there is no commercial fishing
  • Beijing has signed a $204 million memorandum of understanding with the government of Papua New Guinea to build the complex in Daru
  • This is one of the few Torres Strait Islands not governed by Australia
  • However, concerns are being raised by former PNG government adviser Jeffrey Wall and North Queensland MP Warren Entsch that the fishery is just a front for a naval operation
  • According to Jeffrey, the Daru spot is as strategically close to Australia as China can get — a particular worrying fact given the souring relationship between Beijing and Canberra this year
  • He said Australia will need to act quickly if it wants to find a way to stop China from building the major complex just across the sea

China has just forked out over $200 million to build a fishery complex just north of mainland Australia — in an area where there is no commercial fishing.

Beijing struck a $204 million memorandum of understanding with the government of Papua New Guinea to build the complex at Daru, which is one of the few Torres Strait Islands governed by PNG instead of Australia.

This means Australia has no say in the major facility going up right across the sea.

However, former PNG government adviser Jeffrey Wall has raised questions about why China has chosen Daru for the major project.

“I’m assured by people with a reasonable knowledge of PNG’s fisheries that there are no commercial fishing grounds close to Daru. So why plan to spend $200 million on a fish-processing plant in an area not known to have commercial fishery resources?” Jeffrey asked on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) website.

He wrote for the defence policy think tank that Daru is strategically as close to Australia as you can get. As such, given the recent rising tension between Beijing and Canberra, there is some cause for concern.

Jeffrey raised doubt around whether the major Chinese facility will be built for fishing or if that’s simply a front put up by the Chinese government to hide a naval base right off the northern tip of Australia.

This is a view shared by Federal Member for Leichhardt in North Queensland Warren Entsch, whose electorate extends to the Torres Strait Islands.

The MP told the ABC that he believes there could be ulterior motives for the Chinese move.

“Given that we are establishing with Papua New Guinea and America a naval presence on Manu Island, it worries me that there might be other motives for what the Chinese are doing there,” he said.

Nevertheless, Jeffrey said on the ASPI website that if Australia wants to intervene in any way, it will need to act quickly.

“Whatever Australia opts to do, its response will have to be substantial, people-focused and readily achievable,” he wrote.

“One has to hope that the important strategic location of China’s planned investment generates sufficient attention in Canberra to prompt delivery of an appropriate counterproposal, and quickly.”

More From The Market Online
AI concept

The great AI scare sell-off is still permeating Wall Street; a speculative blog from the not-so-distant future stands as the latest culprit

The ongoing tech sell-off in the United States, ironically driven by the larger AI thematic itself, continues to define
US and Aus flag

The XJO benefitted from geopolitical calm last week. New tariff fears perhaps feel more familiar

Last week, I wrote that the ASX200 was having a good week, where Australian investors were reacting to Australian earnings reports and how

Okay, so just where is gold heading? Experts say its nowhere near finishline yet

Leading industry, government and investment groups are still confident that the gold’s bull run is nowhere…
Koala share trading AI

The ASX 200 is up over 4% YTD. What EOY targets are floating around?

It’s been a pretty good year for the ASX200 so far, helped greatly by the ‘commodity supercycle’ narrative – which isn’t really a