Source: Peters Ice Cream
The Market Online - At The Bell

Join our daily newsletter At The Bell to receive exclusive market insights

  • Beloved Australian brand, Peters Ice Cream, has been ordered to pay $12 million after using a distributor to stop competitors’ products being sold in convenience stores and petrol stations
  • Peters purchased PFD Foods, Australia’s largest distributor of ice-cream, on condition that PFD would not sell or distribute competitors’ ice-cream products around Australia
  • Peters owns a number of popular lines such as Connoisseur, Drumstick, Maxibon and Frosty Fruits
  • PFD was approached by other ice-cream manufacturers to distribute new products, however, PFD said it couldn’t due to exclusive arrangements with Peters

Australasian Food Group, trading as Peters Ice Cream, has been ordered to pay a $12 million penalty by the Federal Court, after using a distributor to stop competitors being sold in convenience stores and petrol stations.

Peters has admitted that for five years it purchased distribution services from PFD Food Services on condition that PFD would not sell or distribute competitors’ single serve ice-cream products around Australia without getting written permission.

As a result, competition was substantially lessened for manufacturers of single serve ice-cream and frozen confectionery.

Peters owns a number of favourite ice-cream brands such as Connoisseur, Drumstick, Maxibon and Frosty Fruits. It is one of two major manufacturers of single serve ice-cream products sold in Australian petrol stations and convenience stores.

PFD is Australia’s largest distributor of ice-creams and can reach 90 per cent of Australian postcodes.

“We took this action because we were concerned that Peters Ice Cream’s conduct could reduce competition in this market and impact on the choice of single serve ice-creams available to consumers,” ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.

“Peters Ice Cream admitted that, if PFD had not been restricted from distributing other manufacturers’ ice-cream products, it was likely that one or more potential competitors would have entered or expanded in this market.”

Competitors of the company include Bulla, Gelativo and Pure Pops. PFD was approached by other ice-cream manufacturers to distribute new single serve ice-cream products, however, PFD said it couldn’t due to the exclusive arrangement with Peters.

“This case is a reminder to all businesses of the serious and costly consequences of engaging in anti-competitive conduct,” Ms Cass-Gottlieb said.

“The ACCC is targeting exclusive arrangements by firms with market power that impact competition as one of our compliance and enforcement priorities for 2022-23.”

More From The Market Online
AI concept

The great AI scare sell-off is still permeating Wall Street; a speculative blog from the not-so-distant future stands as the latest culprit

The ongoing tech sell-off in the United States, ironically driven by the larger AI thematic itself, continues to define
US and Aus flag

The XJO benefitted from geopolitical calm last week. New tariff fears perhaps feel more familiar

Last week, I wrote that the ASX200 was having a good week, where Australian investors were reacting to Australian earnings reports and how

Okay, so just where is gold heading? Experts say its nowhere near finishline yet

Leading industry, government and investment groups are still confident that the gold’s bull run is nowhere…
Koala share trading AI

The ASX 200 is up over 4% YTD. What EOY targets are floating around?

It’s been a pretty good year for the ASX200 so far, helped greatly by the ‘commodity supercycle’ narrative – which isn’t really a