Source: USA Today
The Market Online - At The Bell

Join our daily newsletter At The Bell to receive exclusive market insights

  • Around 12,000 U.S. troops will be withdrawn from Germany amid tensions between the two countries about NATO spending
  • The withdrawal will cost the U.S. billions and is expected to take several years to complete
  • However, the U.S. President insists it is necessary, as Germany is “taking advantage” of the country
  • In particular, Donald Trump has criticised Germany for not spending two per cent of GDP on defence
  • The withdrawal will threaten the future of NATO – an alliance of world powers forged post-WWII

The U.S. is pushing ahead with its plan to withdraw around 12,000 troops from Germany, threatening the future of NATO.

U.S. President, Donald Trump, first flagged the withdrawal after complaining that Germany isn’t spending a promised two per cent of its GDP on defence.

In giving the go-ahead on Wednesday, President Trump said the country was “taking advantage of the U.S.”

“We spend a lot of money on Germany, they take advantage of us on trade and they take advantage on the military, so we’re reducing the force,” he said.

The move is a big blow for NATO — the North Atlantic Treaty Organization — a group set up post World War Two to protect Europe from future threats.

Speaking on the withdrawal’s effect on NATO, the U.S. President said it wasn’t America’s responsibility anymore, despite the country being a founding member of the organisation.

“They’re there to protect Europe, they’re there to protect Germany, and Germany is supposed to pay for it,” he said.

“We don’t want to be responsible anymore,” he added.

The withdrawal has already been widely panned by both sides of U.S. politics, as well as by Army officials, who see it as a threat to both America and Europe’s security.

Republican Congressman Mac Thornberry organised a letter last month, signed by 21 others, calling for President Trump to re-think the move.

His call was echoed by fellow Republican Mitt Romney, a staunch critic of Trump, who said the withdrawal would hand Russia a distinct military advantage.

Along with the political consequences, the drawdown of troops is also set to cost the U.S. billions.

Defence officials said they would need to build new barracks across Europe and the U.S. to accommodate for the thousands of troops being moved.

They also revealed the constructions would likely take years to complete.

More From The Market Online

Bullock: Hold call doesn’t rule out further tightening, if that’s required to beat inflation

Michele Bullock has made it very clear that the Reserve Bank is still strongly considering more rate hikes, especially if it’s the only

Reserve Bank holds rates at 4.35% as inflation battle drags on

The Reserve Bank has left the cash rate unchanged at 4.35%, warning inflation remains too high…
Global trade disruption concept with container ships blocked from entering or exiting the Strait of Hormuz. Maritime blockade and geopolitical tension affecting international supply chain and shipping routes.

Markets rally, ASX surges as US-Iran strike preliminary deal to reopen Strait of Hormuz

Australian shares rallied after the US and Iran confirmed a landmark ceasefire agreement, lifting miners, banks…
Close-up view of erupting molten lava, showcasing the intense heat and dynamic nature of volcanic activity.

Records up top, energy melt down, all eyes back on rech

Records on top. Regime turn underneath. Three U.S. indices closed at record highs into a holiday-shortened week. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index ripped +5.53%...